The single most important factor in non-compete enforceability is geography — specifically, which state's law governs the agreement. This varies dramatically: California essentially bans non-competes for employees. Most other states enforce them if they're 'reasonable.' Understanding where your state falls is the first step.
States that effectively ban non-competes
California is the most well-known — California Business and Professions Code Section 16600 voids non-competes for employees almost categorically, with very narrow exceptions. Minnesota banned non-competes for employees effective January 1, 2023. North Dakota has long prohibited non-competes except in very specific circumstances (sale of a business, dissolution of a partnership). Oklahoma prohibits non-competes entirely. If you live in these states, a non-compete in your employment agreement is likely unenforceable — though governing law clauses that point to another state can complicate this.
What makes a non-compete 'reasonable' in states that enforce them
States that enforce non-competes apply a reasonableness test. Courts typically evaluate: duration (6–12 months is generally considered reasonable; 2+ years invites scrutiny), geographic scope (restricted to where you actually worked or competed), industry scope (limited to your actual role, not the entire industry), and whether the employer provides adequate consideration (something of value for your agreement). A non-compete that fails any of these tests may be unenforceable or limited in scope by a court.
What a governing law clause means for your non-compete
Most employment agreements include a governing law clause stating which state's law applies — often the state where the company is headquartered, not where you live. If you live in California but your contract says 'governed by Delaware law,' courts will have to decide which law applies. California courts often apply California law to protect California employees regardless of governing law clauses. But this is litigation-dependent — the governing law clause is something to pay attention to.
The FTC rule on non-competes
In 2024, the FTC issued a rule broadly prohibiting non-competes for most workers. This rule faced significant legal challenges and its status has been contested in federal courts. As of 2026, the enforceability of the FTC rule remains unsettled. The practical implication is that you should not assume federal protection and instead understand your state's rules. Scrutr identifies the specific terms of your non-compete — duration, scope, geography — so you can assess enforceability with your state's rules in mind.
What to do if you have an overbroad non-compete
If your non-compete appears overbroad, you have several options depending on timing. Before signing: negotiate a narrower scope — shorter duration, limited geography, specific role rather than entire industry. After signing but before leaving: document that any work at a new employer would be outside the restricted scope. After leaving: consult an employment attorney if a former employer threatens enforcement — many overbroad non-competes are not pursued in court because the cost-benefit doesn't favor the employer.